Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Terrorists Vs Army
I've said it before and I'll say it again - the only difference between someone labelled a terrorist and someone labelled a soldier is their equipment and funding.
If you can afford to fund an army, including advanced weaponry, well built prison camps for your "enemy combatants", and a uniform, they you are a soldier. If you can't, and can only afford rudimentary home-made bombs, you're a terrorist. It doesn't matter if you kill civilians or jail women and children; this has no bearing.
PS - I bet Israel can't believe it's luck that it can attack the Palestinians with the pseudo-moral excuse as they arbitarily blame Hamas for the kidnapping. And if they want to talk about Hamas being in defiance of international law...
If you can afford to fund an army, including advanced weaponry, well built prison camps for your "enemy combatants", and a uniform, they you are a soldier. If you can't, and can only afford rudimentary home-made bombs, you're a terrorist. It doesn't matter if you kill civilians or jail women and children; this has no bearing.
PS - I bet Israel can't believe it's luck that it can attack the Palestinians with the pseudo-moral excuse as they arbitarily blame Hamas for the kidnapping. And if they want to talk about Hamas being in defiance of international law...